<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: wpSearch 1.5.0.5 Released With Features, Fixes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/</link>
	<description>One programmer's formatted output stream</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:11:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Hi Kenny
I&#039;m using wpSearch 1.5.0.6 for a project, but still getting the &#039;null result&#039; issue.  If you could let me know what you thought it was previously, that could help me find the issue, as I do need to fix it!
Aside from that, great idea :)
Cheers,
Darren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kenny<br />
I&#8217;m using wpSearch 1.5.0.6 for a project, but still getting the &#8216;null result&#8217; issue.  If you could let me know what you thought it was previously, that could help me find the issue, as I do need to fix it!<br />
Aside from that, great idea <img src='http://codefury.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Cheers,<br />
Darren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PROKLA &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; FAQ</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>PROKLA &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; FAQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-190</guid>
		<description>[...] [2, 3] für Wordpress zurechtzubasteln. Oder dem bereits Lucene-basierten Such-Plugin wpsearch [4] die PDF-Dateien irgendwie in den Index schmuggeln&#8230; Aber all das übersteigt meine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [2, 3] für Wordpress zurechtzubasteln. Oder dem bereits Lucene-basierten Such-Plugin wpsearch [4] die PDF-Dateien irgendwie in den Index schmuggeln&#8230; Aber all das übersteigt meine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keller</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-189</guid>
		<description>any possibilities of including pdf-documents into wpsearch?
any hints if 
http://kalanir.blogspot.com/2008/08/indexing-pdf-documents-with-lucene.html
shows a way to index text of pdf-documents that are already ocr-handeled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any possibilities of including pdf-documents into wpsearch?<br />
any hints if<br />
<a href="http://kalanir.blogspot.com/2008/08/indexing-pdf-documents-with-lucene.html" rel="nofollow">http://kalanir.blogspot.com/2008/08/indexing-pdf-documents-with-lucene.html</a><br />
shows a way to index text of pdf-documents that are already ocr-handeled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: option8</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>option8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-137</guid>
		<description>is there any recommended way to exclude posts or pages without content from the search results? i have several that i use as &quot;placeholders&quot; that come up with &quot;...&quot; in the search results. they don&#039;t have content, but the search term is in the title, so they float to the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any recommended way to exclude posts or pages without content from the search results? i have several that i use as &#8220;placeholders&#8221; that come up with &#8220;&#8230;&#8221; in the search results. they don&#8217;t have content, but the search term is in the title, so they float to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lateef</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Lateef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Hi Kenny, Great Plug In! Is there a way to get my Search Results page to display Complete Posts instead of just a listing of Linked Titles?

I edited &#039;search.php&#039; to display the complete post...but it throws out all formatting (no HTML, no links, scripts, etc.) - so if I had embedded a youtube video in the post it won&#039;t show up in the search listing - even though the entire post is displayed (unformatted in one block).

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kenny, Great Plug In! Is there a way to get my Search Results page to display Complete Posts instead of just a listing of Linked Titles?</p>
<p>I edited &#8217;search.php&#8217; to display the complete post&#8230;but it throws out all formatting (no HTML, no links, scripts, etc.) &#8211; so if I had embedded a youtube video in the post it won&#8217;t show up in the search listing &#8211; even though the entire post is displayed (unformatted in one block).</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jure</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I have installed wpsearch on a fairly large website (posts from 2001). After building index I have noticed, that newer posts are not included in my index. 

Using WP 2.6.2

If this could be resolved, WP would finally have a really excellent search plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have installed wpsearch on a fairly large website (posts from 2001). After building index I have noticed, that newer posts are not included in my index. </p>
<p>Using WP 2.6.2</p>
<p>If this could be resolved, WP would finally have a really excellent search plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Griffin</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Hadn&#039;t tried this plug-in in a while so I thought I would give it a go.  But, am I missing something.  It doesn&#039;t recognize the ?  I am not sure if I am missing a step, but on a search I see everything.  I put in &#039;s specifically for search engines, so I would want my own search on my page to honor them.

But the big downfall for me is it is not WordPressMU compatible.  I did a search on my personal blog and the results came in from all over the place, including posts from my business site.  Now, on the other hand, this is a good thing for WordPressMU usrs since a lot what to be able to search their entire community of blogs.  But in my case, I don&#039;t.

I realize that this never stated it was wordpressmu compatible, but I thought I would pass it along.  If I could limit the blogs it was searching, and recognized &#039;s, I would look no future.  Very fast search.

Any idea&#039;s about when or if these 2 features would be recognized?

Thanks.

This should be a simple fix to look only at the current blogs database.  I don&#039;t know.  I didn&#039;t look into the code.  But it would be a nice addition to WordPressMU plug-ins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hadn&#8217;t tried this plug-in in a while so I thought I would give it a go.  But, am I missing something.  It doesn&#8217;t recognize the ?  I am not sure if I am missing a step, but on a search I see everything.  I put in &#8217;s specifically for search engines, so I would want my own search on my page to honor them.</p>
<p>But the big downfall for me is it is not WordPressMU compatible.  I did a search on my personal blog and the results came in from all over the place, including posts from my business site.  Now, on the other hand, this is a good thing for WordPressMU usrs since a lot what to be able to search their entire community of blogs.  But in my case, I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I realize that this never stated it was wordpressmu compatible, but I thought I would pass it along.  If I could limit the blogs it was searching, and recognized &#8217;s, I would look no future.  Very fast search.</p>
<p>Any idea&#8217;s about when or if these 2 features would be recognized?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>This should be a simple fix to look only at the current blogs database.  I don&#8217;t know.  I didn&#8217;t look into the code.  But it would be a nice addition to WordPressMU plug-ins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monika</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Monika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Hi thanks a lot for this plugin.

I have questions;) 

Is it possible to exclude some words --
i.e *in* *at* because if I search for

Hotels in Sao Paolo 

I get hundreds of results with *in* -but I know that my users use the search like my example.

I hope you understand my meanings.

regards

Monika</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi thanks a lot for this plugin.</p>
<p>I have questions;) </p>
<p>Is it possible to exclude some words &#8211;<br />
i.e *in* *at* because if I search for</p>
<p>Hotels in Sao Paolo </p>
<p>I get hundreds of results with *in* -but I know that my users use the search like my example.</p>
<p>I hope you understand my meanings.</p>
<p>regards</p>
<p>Monika</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dunkkan</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Dunkkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Hello Kenny,

Sorry, I think I deleted my last message here. I&#039;d just wanted to know, quickly, if I can set several search boxes in my search page, boxes related between them by one submit button, instead of suggesting to the user he uses the &#039;AND&#039; boolean operator in the search box. I need the user can &#039;jump&#039; from field to field filling it with the terms to search.

Naturally, each field has an html suggestion, let&#039;s say &quot;title&quot;, &quot;author&quot;, &quot;albulm&quot;, &quot;label&quot;, &quot;style&quot; etc.

The &#039;work&#039; the plugin would do is AS if the user had written: &quot;Sacramento AND Miles Davis AND jazz AND Bluenote&quot;, to produce a result which bring him throught the Kind of Blue album; for exemple.

I know, maybe that&#039;s not between your interests developping the plugin, or it&#039;s out of the box the Lucene technology provides, but let me know your opinion, even to start searching somewhere else,

Thanks and Cheers,

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Kenny,</p>
<p>Sorry, I think I deleted my last message here. I&#8217;d just wanted to know, quickly, if I can set several search boxes in my search page, boxes related between them by one submit button, instead of suggesting to the user he uses the &#8216;AND&#8217; boolean operator in the search box. I need the user can &#8216;jump&#8217; from field to field filling it with the terms to search.</p>
<p>Naturally, each field has an html suggestion, let&#8217;s say &#8220;title&#8221;, &#8220;author&#8221;, &#8220;albulm&#8221;, &#8220;label&#8221;, &#8220;style&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>The &#8216;work&#8217; the plugin would do is AS if the user had written: &#8220;Sacramento AND Miles Davis AND jazz AND Bluenote&#8221;, to produce a result which bring him throught the Kind of Blue album; for exemple.</p>
<p>I know, maybe that&#8217;s not between your interests developping the plugin, or it&#8217;s out of the box the Lucene technology provides, but let me know your opinion, even to start searching somewhere else,</p>
<p>Thanks and Cheers,</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dunkkan</title>
		<link>http://codefury.net/2008/08/wpsearch-1505-released-with-features-fixes/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Dunkkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codefury.net/?p=35#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Hello Kenny,

Thanks very much for this wonderful plugin. I just have one doubt about it:

Normally the user should write the terms to search separated by the &#039;AND&#039; property in one single box, but in my case I&#039;d like to provide several boxes to fill (&#039;song&#039;, &#039;artist&#039;, &#039;year&#039;, &#039;label&#039;, &#039;style&#039;), and one final submit button, linking the searched terms with the &#039;AND&#039; property in the &#039;background&#039; in some way.
I don&#039;t know if this can be accomplished, if you can put me in the right direction it could be really great (in the Lucene forum they talk about un-understandable things, so...),

Cheers,

Dunkkan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Kenny,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for this wonderful plugin. I just have one doubt about it:</p>
<p>Normally the user should write the terms to search separated by the &#8216;AND&#8217; property in one single box, but in my case I&#8217;d like to provide several boxes to fill (&#8217;song&#8217;, &#8216;artist&#8217;, &#8216;year&#8217;, &#8216;label&#8217;, &#8217;style&#8217;), and one final submit button, linking the searched terms with the &#8216;AND&#8217; property in the &#8216;background&#8217; in some way.<br />
I don&#8217;t know if this can be accomplished, if you can put me in the right direction it could be really great (in the Lucene forum they talk about un-understandable things, so&#8230;),</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Dunkkan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
