Comments on: WPSearch http://codefury.net One programmer's formatted output stream Thu, 17 May 2012 17:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: David Grant http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1258 David Grant Fri, 20 May 2011 03:39:37 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-1258 I am trying to use both your plugin and Matthew Taylor's Result Count plugin anbd they seem to be incompatible. Used together, Taylor's plugin doesn't recognize when there are more than a page-full of posts. With your plugin disabled, however, it works fine. It looks like your search plugin resets the WP_query found_posts variable so that it is the same as post_count. Does that make sense? I am trying to use both your plugin and Matthew Taylor’s Result Count plugin anbd they seem to be incompatible. Used together, Taylor’s plugin doesn’t recognize when there are more than a page-full of posts. With your plugin disabled, however, it works fine.

It looks like your search plugin resets the WP_query found_posts variable so that it is the same as post_count. Does that make sense?

]]> By: Ionel Roiban http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1249 Ionel Roiban Sat, 14 May 2011 17:32:38 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-1249 Care to share with us a way to use Solr instead of local Lucene. Thank you! Care to share with us a way to use Solr instead of local Lucene. Thank you!

]]> By: Jay http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-943 Jay Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:07:15 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-943 Regarding last comment. I just realized the private pages are not showing in the results, I had assumed by a parent page being private all children pages were also considered private. please disregard #1 in the last comment. Regarding last comment. I just realized the private pages are not showing in the results, I had assumed by a parent page being private all children pages were also considered private. please disregard #1 in the last comment.

]]> By: Jay http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-942 Jay Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:49:29 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-942 First I want to say thank you for this plugin! This is the first of many search plugins that I have tried that actually worked. I give 5 stars to you. But I have a few questions and/or feature requests/recommendations. 1) Is there a way for it to filter out pages that are marked "private" at least for people that are not logged in? Currently anyone in the public can see private posts through search. 2) We use WordPress mainly as a CMS with many pages and few posts, many of our pages have tables located near the top of the page. Is there a way to have the output skip any text within a <code><table></code> (or an option to do so since this may be desired by some). 3) Finally, and this may be available and I just missed it, would it be possible for the search results to only consist of the_excerpt(), but the index being built from the_content()? - or is this just the way I need to set up the search results page? Thanks again for your awesome plugin, Jay First I want to say thank you for this plugin! This is the first of many search plugins that I have tried that actually worked. I give 5 stars to you. But I have a few questions and/or feature requests/recommendations.

1) Is there a way for it to filter out pages that are marked “private” at least for people that are not logged in? Currently anyone in the public can see private posts through search.

2) We use WordPress mainly as a CMS with many pages and few posts, many of our pages have tables located near the top of the page. Is there a way to have the output skip any text within a <table> (or an option to do so since this may be desired by some).

3) Finally, and this may be available and I just missed it, would it be possible for the search results to only consist of the_excerpt(), but the index being built from the_content()? – or is this just the way I need to set up the search results page?

Thanks again for your awesome plugin,

Jay

]]> By: evan http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-803 evan Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:28:19 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-803 I use WP version 2.8.x and 2.9.x. Can I use this plugin? because it written: Requires WordPress Version: 3.0 or higher. Or which parts of code should be re-write to make this plugin suitable for 2.8 and 2.9. I use WP version 2.8.x and 2.9.x. Can I use this plugin? because it written: Requires WordPress Version: 3.0 or higher. Or which parts of code should be re-write to make this plugin suitable for 2.8 and 2.9.

]]> By: Enhancing WordPress Search Results Using Post Types and Relevance | Logos Creative – Atlanta Web, Design & Video http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-400 Enhancing WordPress Search Results Using Post Types and Relevance | Logos Creative – Atlanta Web, Design & Video Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:47:47 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-400 [...] still returning them by date and not relevance. After some trial and error, I decided on using the wpSearch plug-in. Now, I can customize the relevancy of the results, which worked well on the old [...] [...] still returning them by date and not relevance. After some trial and error, I decided on using the wpSearch plug-in. Now, I can customize the relevancy of the results, which worked well on the old [...]

]]> By: Doing yet more with plugins « ArchivePress + APrints http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-360 Doing yet more with plugins « ArchivePress + APrints Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:16:19 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-360 [...] other plugin that looks particularly interesting is the Lucene-based search plugin, wpSearch. This looks like it could add a superior search experience over a large blog – or blog [...] [...] other plugin that looks particularly interesting is the Lucene-based search plugin, wpSearch. This looks like it could add a superior search experience over a large blog – or blog [...]

]]> By: ArchivePress » Blog Archive » Doing yet more with plugins http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-178 ArchivePress » Blog Archive » Doing yet more with plugins Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:19:42 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-178 [...] other plugin that looks particularly interesting is the Lucene-based search plugin, wpSearch. This looks like it could add a superior search experience over a large blog – or blog [...] [...] other plugin that looks particularly interesting is the Lucene-based search plugin, wpSearch. This looks like it could add a superior search experience over a large blog – or blog [...]

]]> By: ArchivePress » Blog Archive » Plugins http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-177 ArchivePress » Blog Archive » Plugins Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:15:40 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-177 [...] other plugin that looks particularly interesting is the Lucene-based search plugin, wpSearch. This looks like it could add a superior search experience over a large blog – or blog [...] [...] other plugin that looks particularly interesting is the Lucene-based search plugin, wpSearch. This looks like it could add a superior search experience over a large blog – or blog [...]

]]> By: 5 Useful but Lesser Known Wordpress Plugins | Armchair Theorist http://codefury.net/projects/wpsearch/comment-page-1/#comment-176 5 Useful but Lesser Known Wordpress Plugins | Armchair Theorist Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:44:42 +0000 http://katzgrau.simplesample.org/projects/wpsearch/#comment-176 [...] the Search Reloaded plugin. Unfortunately, it wasn’t free. Someone in the comments suggested wpSearch (a Lucene-based search engine), but unfortunately it had annoying problems with indexing after [...] [...] the Search Reloaded plugin. Unfortunately, it wasn’t free. Someone in the comments suggested wpSearch (a Lucene-based search engine), but unfortunately it had annoying problems with indexing after [...]

]]>